Conformal-Cooled Inserts
Mould and die inserts with cooling channels that follow the cavity contour instead of being drilled straight, cutting cycle time and removing hot spots.
The unglamorous work that decides whether a line runs: a mould insert with cooling channels that follow the cavity, a gripper that stops marking the product, a bracket for a machine whose manufacturer discontinued it in 2009. No tooling, small quantities, and a price that makes sense at one-off volumes.

A production line is stopped by the smallest things. A gripper jaw that marks a visible face. A fixture that was made for the previous version of the product. A sensor bracket for a machine that has not been supported for fifteen years. In every one of those cases the part is small, the quantity is one or two, and the conventional route — drawing, quoting, setup, minimum order, six weeks — is out of proportion to the problem. That is exactly the shape of job additive manufacturing is good at, and it is why a large share of the tooling work we do never appears in a catalogue.
The one place printing does something a conventional process genuinely cannot is conformal cooling. A mould insert normally has cooling drilled in straight lines, because that is what a drill does. The result is that the corners of the cavity run hotter than the middle, and that difference is where warpage and sink marks come from. Printed in metal, the channels follow the contour of the cavity — closer to the hot spots, constant distance from the surface, and in whatever cross-section the thermal calculation asks for. Cycle time goes down, scrap goes down, and the part stops being a compromise. It is the single strongest technical argument for printing a tool.
The other recurring job is the part that no longer exists. If a machine is still earning its keep and a component fails, the choice is often between printing one and replacing the machine. Send us the broken part or the drawing — we measure it, rebuild it as a model, and print it in a material that suits what it has to do. It is not always the right answer, and where a standard part exists we will tell you to buy it instead; but when nothing exists, printing one is a much better day than stopping.
FDM deserves an honest mention here too, because it is a different answer in a tool room than it is on a camera. It is cheap, it is fast, and it will put a jig or a guard in your hands in an afternoon — for a fixture that only has to hold a part in position while somebody works on it, or a large guard that nothing measures, that is a reasonable route and a sensible use of the money. What decides the answer here is the duty, not the shape. The moment a tool has to take load, hold a fit or run at temperature, the material decides the route, and the materials we print for industry — 316L, AlSi10Mg, copper, PA12 — are not what an FDM machine runs. It is not a process we offer here, so when a job genuinely belongs on one we will say so and point you at it rather than print you a metal part that did not need to be metal.
Seven recurring jobs. Most arrive with a photograph and a deadline rather than a drawing, which is fine.
Mould and die inserts with cooling channels that follow the cavity contour instead of being drilled straight, cutting cycle time and removing hot spots.
Assembly, welding, inspection and machining fixtures in PA12 or printed metal — made for one operation and modified when the operation changes.
End-of-arm tooling and jaws shaped to a specific product, in a soft nylon where marking is a problem and in metal where force is.
A failed or discontinued component, measured and rebuilt as a model, printed in a material matched to the duty.
Consolidated fluid blocks and manifolds that replace a brazed assembly of tubes and fittings, removing joints as leak paths.
Guards, mounts, covers and cable brackets for plant equipment — thin structure, no tooling, one-off quantities.
The bracket or housing you need twenty of before, or instead of, committing to a tool.
See the parts gallery for examples across SLM, SLA and SLS, grouped by process.
Tolerances and lead times are read from the process pages, so they cannot drift from what the quote engine works to.
| Process | Why it fits this sector | Typical tolerance | Typical lead time |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLM Metal 3D Printing | Tooling and spares that have to be metal. Conformal cooling, wear surfaces, thermal parts and anything that replaces a machined component. | ±0.2 mm | 7–10 days |
| SLS Nylon 3D Printing | Jigs, fixtures and grippers in PA12 nylon. No supports, tough, and cheap enough that a fixture modified next month is a non-event. | ±0.3 mm | 3–5 days |
These are typical values we hold routinely, not absolute limits — send us the drawing and we will confirm what is achievable on your geometry. Compare all processes, or see post-processing & finishing for what happens after the print.
The material usually follows the duty: 316L where corrosion and toughness matter, AlSi10Mg where weight or heat does, copper where the thermal path is the whole point.
Tough, ductile and highly corrosion resistant — the grade that survives chlorides and food acids. Manifolds, process hardware, tooling and marine parts that cannot be serviced.
Full material data →Low density, useful strength and excellent thermal conductivity. The material for weight-critical brackets, heat sinks and RF housings in automotive, drones and electronics.
Full material data →Up to 100 % IACS electrical conductivity and ~400 W/m·K thermal, in three-dimensional geometry that machining cannot produce. The hardest metal to print — and quoted only after an engineer reviews the part.
Full material data →Tough, chemically resistant and dimensionally stable, and it prints with no supports to remove. The default material for functional prototypes, brackets, housings and low-volume end-use parts.
Full material data →Copper is the specialist option and the hardest to build well. For a thermal insert it can be worth the premium; send the geometry early and we will tell you whether it is realistic.
A tool that is dimensionally close but functionally wrong costs more than the part. These are the checks we take before and after the build.
Industrial clients usually want the honest answer faster than they want a quote. These are the cases where we will tell you printing is not the route.
Yes — this is one of the most common jobs we take. Send the part itself (or good photographs with a ruler in frame if it is still in service) and we measure or scan it, rebuild it as a solid model, and print it. Since the geometry is rebuilt as a model rather than copied, it is also an opportunity to fix the feature that failed in the first place.
It depends entirely on the part. Where a cavity has deep cores or thick sections, a drilled cooling layout leaves hot spots, and hot spots mean longer cycle times, more warpage and more scrap. Printed channels follow the cavity, so the mould runs cooler and more evenly. On the right part it pays for itself quickly; on a simple flat part it does not, and we will say which one you have.
No, and be careful with anyone who says yes without qualifications. What we print is 316L stainless steel and AlSi10Mg aluminium, hardened and machined afterwards where a wear surface is needed. For very long production runs, a hardened machined tool is still the right answer and printing is not a substitute for it. For inserts, prototype tools and low-to-medium runs, printed 316L works well.
We separate the part into features that need to be accurate and features that only need to be approximately right. Mating faces, bores, seals and threads are machined after printing to a conventional tolerance. Everything else is printed, and the printed tolerance is the figure on the process page. That division is what makes a printed tool usable rather than a curiosity.
Yes, and a set is often better value than a single part because the build plate is shared. Send the whole set with the operations they support and we will quote it as one job, which is usually cheaper than quoting them one at a time — and it means the whole set arrives together.
Yes. We supply titanium, 316L, aluminium alloy, copper and nylon powders in bulk with batch traceability, for clients who run their own SLM or SLS line. Metal powders are export-controlled in many jurisdictions, so run the destination through the eligibility checker on this site before you commit to a shipment.
A drawing is ideal but not required. Send what you have and describe what the part has to do — load, temperature, cycle count, the surface it touches. We will tell you whether printing is the right route and what it costs.
Built for global product teams · Worldwide shipping via DHL / FedEx / UPS