Joint Housings & Actuator Bodies
Load-bearing joint structure that also houses the actuator and routes its cabling — printed as one part instead of a stack of machined plates and standoffs.
A humanoid joint is not a bracket. It carries real load, it has to be light enough for the actuator to move, and the cables and sensors have to pass through it. Additive manufacturing happens to be genuinely good at that combination — which is why this sector is the one we have chosen to specialise in.

A robot joint has three requirements that fight each other. It has to be stiff enough that the linkage does not flex under load, light enough that the actuator can accelerate it all day, and hollow enough to route cables, sensor leads and sometimes a cooling path through the middle. Machining gives you the first one and makes the other two expensive: you drill straight holes and then bolt plates together until it fits, and every bolted joint is mass and compliance you did not want. SLM just prints the load path you designed and leaves the rest empty.
The second reason is the iteration speed, and in robotics it is arguably the bigger one. A humanoid is redesigned constantly — a joint moves, an actuator changes, an encoder needs somewhere else to live. With a machined part each change means a new drawing, a new setup and a new lead time. With a printed part it means a new file, and the new version is in your hand in the same week the old version was. Teams that print their structure iterate two or three times more often in a year than teams that machine it, and that difference compounds.
What we would not do is print the whole arm. Bearings are bought, not printed. Gears and harmonic drives are bought or machined, because the tolerances and the surface finish they need are beyond what a printed surface delivers reliably. Sealing faces and precision bores get machined after printing. The useful division is: print the structure that is expensive to machine and cheap to print, and buy the components that are already made in volume by specialists. We will say so when a part lands on the wrong side of that line.
The parts that come through this shop repeatedly. Most of them are structural, most of them consolidate something that used to be several machined pieces, and most of them have wires running through them.
Load-bearing joint structure that also houses the actuator and routes its cabling — printed as one part instead of a stack of machined plates and standoffs.
Topology-optimised limbs and links: stiffness where the load path runs, material removed everywhere else, in titanium or aluminium.
Low-volume, high-variation parts that change with every payload — printed in metal for force or nylon for compliance and quick replacement.
Mounts and guides with the channel built into the part, so a lead is protected by structure rather than clipped to the outside of it.
Shin, torso and head shells in PA12 nylon: thin, tough, and with mounting bosses and vent paths printed in place.
Packs, mounts and busbar hardware, with copper printed where the current path has to be shaped rather than bent.
Jigs and fixtures for the assembly cell and the calibration rig — typically SLS, made in a day, modified in an hour.
Pulleys, guides, tensioners and non-critical transmission parts, in metal where strength matters and nylon where weight does.
See the parts gallery for examples across SLM, SLA and SLS, grouped by process.
Tolerance and lead time are read from the process pages, so these are the same figures the quote engine works to — not a second copy that can drift.
| Process | Why it fits this sector | Typical tolerance | Typical lead time |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLM Metal 3D Printing | Load-bearing structure. Titanium for strength per gram and corrosion resistance, aluminium where the thermal path matters or the budget is tighter. Internal channels and consolidated geometry come free. | ±0.2 mm | 7–10 days |
| SLS Nylon 3D Printing | Frames, covers and brackets in PA12 nylon. No supports at all, so a complex cover prints as one piece whatever is inside it, and it takes knocks better than resin. | ±0.3 mm | 3–5 days |
| SLA Resin 3D Printing | Appearance and fit models, and any part with a fine feature or a smooth surface. Also the fastest route to a shape in your hand for a design review. | ±0.1 mm | 2–4 days |
These are typical values we hold routinely, not absolute limits — send us the drawing and we will confirm what is achievable on your geometry. Compare all processes, or see post-processing & finishing for what happens after the print.
Four materials cover nearly all of it: two metals for structure and two nylons for everything around it.
The reference SLM alloy. Highest strength-to-weight of anything we print, and effectively immune to salt water. The default for robot joints, aerospace brackets and non-implant medical instruments.
Full material data →Low density, useful strength and excellent thermal conductivity. The material for weight-critical brackets, heat sinks and RF housings in automotive, drones and electronics.
Full material data →Tough, chemically resistant and dimensionally stable, and it prints with no supports to remove. The default material for functional prototypes, brackets, housings and low-volume end-use parts.
Full material data →Up to 100 % IACS electrical conductivity and ~400 W/m·K thermal, in three-dimensional geometry that machining cannot produce. The hardest metal to print — and quoted only after an engineer reviews the part.
Full material data →Copper is the specialist one — printed copper has real electrical and thermal value but is the hardest of the four to build well, so send the geometry early and we will tell you if it is realistic.
For structural parts, the decisions that matter are taken before the machine starts. These are the ones we take with you.
Structural work is where an overstated claim hurts most, because the part carries load. This is our honest list.
No, and nobody should. We print the structural parts: joint housings, frames, links, brackets and covers. Bearings, gears, harmonic drives, actuators, encoders and fasteners are bought from specialists who make them better and cheaper than any printing process can. The useful split is that we make the geometry that is expensive to machine, and you buy the components that are already made in volume.
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V when strength per gram and corrosion resistance decide the design, which is most joints on a humanoid. Aluminium AlSi10Mg when the part also has to move heat, or when the budget is the constraint — it is lighter per unit volume but weaker and less stiff. Send the load case and the mass budget and we will tell you which one we would pick, and where the part is marginal.
We print a pilot and machine it afterwards. A printed surface is rough and its tolerance is an order of magnitude looser than a bearing seat needs, so printing the feature and hoping is how a joint ends up with play in it. The machining step is quoted with the print, not discovered later.
Yes, and it is one of the reasons printing wins on a joint. The constraint is that un-melted powder has to be evacuated, so a channel must be reachable from outside the part — a fully sealed internal void cannot be cleared. Design the channel with a clear escape path and we will build it.
A research unit is one order; a pilot build is tens. Up to those quantities the price per part is stable, because the cost is machine time and material rather than tooling. When the volume starts to argue for casting or moulding we will say so — that is a decision you should make with the number in front of you.
Yes, and we would rather sign one than not. Files are treated as yours, access is limited to the people planning and running the build, and we do not show client parts in our own marketing without written permission. Humanoid geometry is competitive advantage — we treat it that way.
A STEP file if you have one, plus the load case and the mass target for structural parts. If the design is still moving, send what exists and describe the constraint — we will tell you which features are printable as drawn and which will need a change before it is worth quoting.
We will tell you which process we would use, where the part is marginal, and what we would machine rather than print. If it belongs with us, you get a price and a build plan; if it does not, we will say so.
Built for global product teams · Worldwide shipping via DHL / FedEx / UPS